BenchLeader

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Reasoning effort

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is a DeepSeek open-weights reasoning model, released 17 Oct 2026. Its best configuration (max reasoning effort) ranks #72 of 775 on the BenchLeader Index at 63.1 ±6.8, in the upper half. The ± is the point: 207 other configurations score within that range, so they and this one cannot be told apart on quality alone — price and speed are what separate them. It scores highest in reasoning (81) and lowest in knowledge (64). At $0.525 per million tokens blended it is mid-priced. Output speed of 209 tokens per second puts it in the fastest quarter, with a first answer in 10.7 s. It has been measured at 2 reasoning-effort settings; this summary describes the best-scoring one, and the tabs above switch between them. Last measured 17 Oct 2026.

Blended price
$0.525/M
$0.300 in · $1.20 out
Output speed
209 tok/s
measured by Artificial Analysis
First answer
11 s
first token 0.86 s
Context
1.0M
Full answer
13 s
median, reasoning included
Cost per run
$0.262
one full Intelligence Index run
Released
17 Oct 2026
How it scores by categoryDashed line = average model (50). One step of 15 = one standard deviation.
  1. Overall index63
  2. Reasoning81
  3. Knowledge64
  4. Multimodal64
  5. Long context67
  6. Composite80

Versions

DeepSeek has shipped 2 models under this name. Each is ranked on its own results; a newer version often has fewer results so far, which holds its index nearer the average until more arrive.

ModelReleasedIndexRank
NewDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017maxthis page17 Oct 202663.1#72
DeepSeek V4.1 Flashmax10 Sept 202662.0#90

Reasoning-effort configurations

The same model behaves differently depending on how much it is allowed to think. Each row is one setting, scored only on the benchmarks that were run at that setting. “Not stated” collects results from publishers that did not say which setting they used; for a reasoning model that is usually its thinking mode, but we do not assume it. Pick a setting here or at the top of the page to see its price, speed and category scores.

EffortIndexRankSpeedFirst answerChat reply costCategories
maxbest63.1#72209 tok/s11 s$0.0005Composite 80 · Knowledge 64 · Long context 67 · Multimodal 64 · Reasoning 81
not stated––60 tok/s0.86 s$0.0005Composite 63

Benchmark results

See all LLM benchmarks. One column per reasoning effort. Rank is among every configuration of every model on that benchmark. Hover a score for the run it came from.

Reasoning

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 2.0 Reasoningnot in indexeffort not stated–89.1%#19LiveBench
Humanity's Last Exam (AA)not in index43.3%#58–Artificial Analysis
CritPt24.0%#48–Artificial Analysis

Coding

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 2.0 Codingnot in indexeffort not stated–96.0%#4LiveBench
SciCode (AA)not in index55.9%#42–Artificial Analysis
Code Migrationnot in index44.2%#24–Vals AI
Vibe Code Bench v1.1not in index87.7%#11–Vals AI
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA)not in index33.8%#37–Artificial Analysis
FrontierCode 1.1 (AA)not in index43.7%#14–Artificial Analysis

Agents & tools

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Long Agenticnot in indexeffort not stated–50.9%#12LiveBench
LiveBench Browsernot in indexeffort not stated–76.0%#19LiveBench
GDPval-AA v2.1not in index62.3%#7–Artificial Analysis
Finance Agent v2not in index57.0%#17–Vals AI
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmarknot in index14.2%#7–Vals AI
Legal Research Benchnot in index45.2%#17–Vals AI
Tax Agent Benchnot in index44.4%#5–Vals AI
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals)not in index31.8%#17–Vals AI
AutomationBenchnot in index66.6%#12–Artificial Analysis
GDP.pdf (AA)not in index17.2%#82–Artificial Analysis
AA-Briefcase v1.1not in index1570#18–Artificial Analysis
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (AA)not in index12.9%#22–Artificial Analysis

Knowledge

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 2.0 Data Analysisnot in indexeffort not stated–79.5%#12LiveBench
LiveBench Researchnot in indexeffort not stated–79.5%#18LiveBench
AA-Omniscience4.7#108–Artificial Analysis
Excel Modeling Benchmarknot in index61.8%#32–Vals AI
AA-Omniscience: accuracynot in index42.9%#103–Artificial Analysis
AA-Omniscience: non-hallucinationnot in index33.3%#200–Artificial Analysis

Multimodal

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench Designnot in indexeffort not stated–83.4%#4LiveBench
MMMU-Pro80.6%#44–Artificial Analysis

Long context

BenchmarkmaxSourceTrend
AA-LCR82.7%#35Artificial Analysis

Composite

Benchmarkmaxnot statedSourceTrend
LiveBench 2.0effort not stated–79.2%#10LiveBench
AA Intelligence Index v4.3.245.1#36–Artificial Analysis
Vals Indexnot in index61.3#8–Vals AI

Where to run it

Every provider serving this model through OpenRouter, with throughput and first-token latency measured on live traffic over the last 30 minutes and each provider’s own price. Purple marks the best in each column.

ProviderSpeedFirst tokenInput $/MOutput $/MContextQuantisation
Baseten228 tok/s0.37 s$0.300$1.201.0M–
Together227 tok/s0.23 s$0.300$1.201.0M–
Wafer141 tok/s0.61 s$0.160$0.5001.0Mmxfp4
inference.net124 tok/s0.53 s$0.080$0.5001.0Mfp8
AtlasCloud121 tok/s1.06 s$0.300$1.201.0Mfp8
inference.net117 tok/s0.44 s$0.080$0.5001.0Mfp8
Morph116 tok/s0.76 s$0.172$0.6001.0Mfp8
Parasail114 tok/s0.80 s$0.300$1.201.0Mfp8
SiliconFlow111 tok/s1.50 s$0.300$1.201.0Mfp8
Prime Intellect103 tok/s1.49 s$0.300$1.201.0M–
GMICloud103 tok/s1.78 s$0.300$1.201.0Mfp8
Relace100 tok/s0.86 s$0.070$0.5001.0M–
Fireworks98 tok/s1.85 s$0.300$1.201.0M–
Crusoe92 tok/s0.79 s$0.290$1.201.0Mfp8
DeepInfra77 tok/s0.58 s$0.098$0.2941.0Mfp8
Decart77 tok/s1.63 s$0.090$0.1801.0Mfp4
DeepInfra73 tok/s0.93 s$0.147$0.4411.0Mfp8
DeepInfra67 tok/s1.95 s$0.078$0.2351.0Mfp8
DeepSeek64 tok/s0.86 s$0.150$0.6001.0M–
Alibaba Cloud Int.58 tok/s0.79 s$0.330$1.321M–
NovitaAI56 tok/s3.60 s$0.300$1.201.0Mfp8
Cloudflare47 tok/s6.05 s$0.100$0.6001.0M–

Price history

Listed price per 1M tokens over time, as recorded by OpenRouter for the provider with the longest history.

$0.00$0.165$0.330$0.495$0.660Oct 26
input outputnow $0.049 in · $0.600 out

What a task costs

Estimates from list price, output speed and time to first answer for the best configuration. “With caching” assumes three-quarters of the input is served from the prompt cache at $0.006 per 1M. Reasoning tokens are not modelled.

WorkloadTokens in / outCostWith cachingTime
Chat reply400 / 300$0.0005$0.000412.1 s
Summarize a 30-page report12,000 / 600$0.0043$0.001713.5 s
Code edit6,000 / 1,500$0.0036$0.002317.8 s
Agentic coding session60,000 / 4,000$0.023$0.009629.8 s
Structured extraction2,000 / 200$0.0008$0.000411.6 s

More from DeepSeek

New this month

Compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 with…

See also

Data as of 21 Oct 2026. Compare these configurations.

Cite as: BenchLeader, “DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: benchmarks, pricing, speed and rank”, https://www.benchleader.com/models/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017, data as of 21 Oct 2026.